Methods
Every answer keeps its evidence type. A list is not a flora. A map is not a walkover. A nursery name is not the Australian Plant Census.
- Observed
- Recorded in the field at the subject place.
- Documented
- A source contains a relevant record. This does not necessarily establish occurrence on the exact subject site. Absence from the record is not absence on the ground.
- Mapped
- Shown on an authoritative spatial layer intersecting the place — remnant regional ecosystem, cadastre, a park polygon. Graphical, not a legal survey, unless that is what the layer is.
- Expected
- Associated with vegetation mapped at the site. An ecological association, not an inventory.
- Modelled
- Predicted by a model or spatial product rather than directly measured in the field. Climate reanalysis is not a BoM station. SLGA is not a soil pit.
- Inferred
- A reasoned interpretation from other evidence.
- Unknown
- Not established. Unknown is better than invented.
Research chain
Place → geometry → authoritative mapping → occurrence records → expected assemblage → field evidence → interpretation → confidence → provenance.
A user can stop at any layer. A specialist can inspect the source.
This is a research platform, not an identification key and not a substitute for a botanist on the ground. Technical query detail sits under Sources & provenance on each place.